Physicochemical and antioxidant activity of rubber honey powder prepared by foam-mat vacuum drying

Open

F. Jaya, L.E. Radiati, T. Estiasih, A. Lastriyanto, D. Masyithoh, A.R. Maharani, N.A. Aryandra

2026 Food Research Vol. 10 Issue 2 Article Cited by 0

Abstract

Producing powdered honey remains a technical challenge for both industry and researchers due to honey's inherent stickiness and thermal sensitivity. Foam mat drying is the process of converting materials from liquid to stable foam before air drying, enhancing drying efficiency and reducing product loss. Tween 60 is a low molecular surfactant that can absorb water well at the air-water interface and reduce tension, increasing the surface area of the drying material. This study aimed to develop honey powder from rubber (H. brasiliensis) using maltodextrin (MD) and gum Arabic (GA) as carrier agents. Foam-mat drying under vacuum conditions was applied, and the resulting honey powders were evaluated for their physicochemical properties, antioxidant capacity, and bioactive compound contents. The results showed that MD-based honey powder exhibited significantly lower moisture content (1.53%), faster dissolving time (43.05 s), higher solubility (99.34%), bulk density (0.65 g/mL), tapped density (1.81 g/mL), and powder yield (96%) than its GA-based counterpart. In contrast, GA-based honey powder had a higher hygroscopic rate (0.015 g.H2O/g solid.h), glass transition temperature (45.3°C), diastase activity (6.09 DN), total phenolic content (107.70 mg GAE/100 g), total flavonoid content (48.07 µg QE/100 g), and stronger antioxidant activity (lowest IC50 = 5.68 mg/ mL). GA-based honey powders also lower hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) content (11.81 mg/100 g), Hausner ratio (2.32) and Carr Index (56.90%) than the MD-based counterpart. Thus, the results concluded that GA had a higher potential as a carrier for producing honey powder using vacuum foam mat drying than MD. © 2026 The Authors. Published by Rynnye Lyan Resources.

Affiliations

Universitas Brawijaya, Department of Animal Products Technology, Faculty of Animal Science, East Java, Malang, 65145, Indonesia; Universitas Brawijaya, Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, East Java, Malang, 65145, Indonesia; Universitas Brawijaya, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, East Java, Malang, 65145, Indonesia; Islamic University of Malang, Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Malang, 65144, Indonesia