A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Cassava Addition in a Buffalo Diet: In Vivo Investigations on Performance and Rumen Health

Open

F.M.A. Amirul, N.A. Mazlan, S. Sadarman, N.D. Rusli, M.M. Sholikin, A. Irawan, D. Febrina, N. Qomariyah, R.A. Nurfitriani, S. Aditya, A. Jayanegara, M.Z. Saad, D.N. Adli, H.A. Hassim

2025 Tropical Animal Science Journal Vol. 48 Issue 4 Article Cited by 3 Quartile

Abstract

This meta-analysis compiles data on buffalo consumption of cassava as a feed ingredient to evaluate its impact on in vivo rumen fermentation, feed intake, nutrient intake, growth performance, digestibility, nitrogen metabolism, haematology, microbiology, and milk yield. A systematic search of Scopus and Web of Science identified 19 in vivo experiments. Cassava varieties were categorized as by-products, foliage, and roots, while buffaloes were stratified based on management system, breed, and sex. A linear mixed model was applied to estimate the effects of cassava inclusion. The findings indicated feed and nutrient intake, particularly crude protein intake and nitrogen retention, increased significantly (p<0.05), while crude protein digestibility showed no significant difference. Microbiological parameters, including total bacterial and fungal counts, also increased significantly (p<0.05), whereas methane production after 24 hours declined significantly (p<0.05). Although production parameters such as body weight, feed conversion, and milk yield were not significantly affected, a trend toward improvement was observed, except for feed conversion. Cassava root and foliage exhibited the highest digestibility and nitrogen retention compared to by-product (p<0.05). A restricted feeding system resulted in higher ammonia (NH3-N) concentrations, protozoa count, and proteolytic and cellulolytic microbial populations compared to ad libitum feeding and an extensive system (p<0.05). Murrah buffaloes showed greater feed intake, while male buffaloes demonstrated higher digestibility (p<0.05). In conclusion, dietary cassava, approximately 1.5% to 20.5% DM, potentially stimulates rumen fermentation, nutrient intake, digestibility, and microbiology but has only a modest effect on production parameters. High cassava inclusion may reduce feed acceptability, thereby decreasing feed efficiency. Copyright © 2025 by Authors, published by Tropical Animal Science Journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License, (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Affiliations

Animal Production and Nutrition Research Group, Department of Veterinary Preclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Pengkalan Chepa, Kelantan, 16100, Malaysia; Advanced Livestock and Aquaculture Research Group (ALAREG), Faculty of Agro-Based Industry, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Jeli Campus, Jeli, Kelantan, 17600, Malaysia; Department of Animal Science, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim, Pekanbaru, 28293, Indonesia; Animal Feed and Nutrition Modelling Research Group (AFENUE), IPB University, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia; Department of Agriculture Science, Faculty of Agro-Based Industry, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Jeli Campus, Jeli, Kelantan, 17600, Malaysia; Research Center for Animal Husbandry, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor, 16915, Indonesia; Vocational School, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, 57126, Indonesia; Department of Animal and Rangeland Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, 97331, Oregon, United States; Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Research Organization for Agriculture and Food National Research and Innovation Agency of The Republic of Indonesia (BRIN), Cibinong Sciences Center, Bogor, Indonesia; Department of Animal Science, Politeknik Negeri Jember, Jember, Indonesia; Research Group of Feed-Food Safety, Research Center for Food Technology and Processing, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Yogyakarta, Indonesia; Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, East Java, Malang, 65514, Indonesia; Faculty of Animal Science, Department of Animal Feed and Nutrition, IPB University, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia; Department of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnostics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Serdang, 43400, Malaysia; Department of Veterinary Preclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Serdang, 43400, Malaysia; Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Serdang, 43400, Malaysia; Department Feed and Animal Nutrititon, Smart Livestock Study Programme, Universitas Brawijaya, East Java, Malang, 65145, Indonesia